Nate Tibbetts’ hiring exposes ugly double standard in WNBA wage gap

Sports and politics are inseparable. It’s a fact, not an opinion. The issues of racism, sexism, homophobia, and transphobia are all displayed on the screens during both professional and amateur sporting events. Back in 1973, Billie Jean King challenged the wage gap when she was paid just $10,000 compared to the $25,000 awarded to men at that year’s US Open. The US Women’s National Team also challenged US Soccer over the pay disparity between their contract and the men’s team’s contract, despite being far more successful.

Recently, the WNBA has been involved in the wage gap discussion—a topic that has sparked controversy.

Orlando Magic assistant coach, Matt Tibbetts, has been appointed as the new head coach of the Phoenix Mercury and will be the highest-paid coach in WNBA history. This appointment has raised eyebrows and questions.

If Nate Tibbetts becomes the highest-paid coach, it means he’ll be earning more than legendary WNBA figures such as Cheryl Reeve, Teresa Weatherspoon, and Sandy Brondello. This fact has sparked outrage and disbelief among fans and players alike.

Nate Tibbetts’ coaching background does not align with his proposed role as a head coach in the WNBA, which has left many questioning the decision.

The statistics speak volumes. The WNBA has been challenged for under-representing multicultural women in their coaching roles. The league has had issues associated with its lack of diversity and equitable pay.

The gender pay gap is a concerning issue that permeates beyond sports. It’s prevalent in every industry, and the disparity in pay and opportunities for women must be addressed.

The fight for equity isn’t restricted to sports. The WNBA players have been at the forefront of social justice, advocating for societal change and a more equitable future for all.

Sports don’t exist in a vacuum; they reflect and shape society, and the issues of inequality persist in both.